Classicnewcar.us


Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Kid

Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Kid

Javascript is currently disabled in your browser. Several features of this site will not function whilst javascript is disabled.open access to scientific and medical researchfrom submission to first editorial decision.from editorial acceptance to publication.*Business days (Mon-Fri)Papers PublishedOpen access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.Dove Medical Press is a member of the OAI.Bulk reprints for the pharmaceutical industry.We offer real benefits to our authors, including fast-track processing of papers.Back to Browse Journals » Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment » Volume 10 Authors Sasaki T, Hashimoto K, Tachibana M, Kurata T, Okawada K, Ishikawa M, Kimura H, Komatsu H, Ishikawa M, Hasegawa T, Shiina A, Hashimoto T, Kanahara N, Shiraishi T, Iyo M Received 29 November 2013 Accepted for publication 24 December 2013 Published 24 January 2014 Volume 2014:10 Pages 147—151 DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S58480 Checked for plagiarism Yes Review by Single-blind Peer reviewer comments 2 Tsuyoshi Sasaki,1,2 Kenji Hashimoto,3 Masumi Tachibana,1 Tsutomu Kurata,1 Keiko Okawada,1 Maki Ishikawa,1 Hiroshi Kimura,2 Hideki Komatsu,2 Masatomo Ishikawa,2 Tadashi Hasegawa,2 Akihiro Shiina,1 Tasuku Hashimoto,2 Nobuhisa Kanahara,3 Tetsuya Shiraishi,2 Masaomi Iyo1–31Department of Child Psychiatry, Chiba University Hospital, 2Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 3Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba, JapanBackground: Tipepidine (3-[di-2-thienylmethylene]-1-methylpiperidine) has been used solely as a nonnarcotic antitussive in Japan since 1959. The safety of tipepidine in children and adults has already been established. It is reported that tipepidine inhibits G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK)-channel currents. The inhibition of GIRK channels by tipepidine is expected to modulate the level of monoamines in the brain. We put forward the hypothesis that tipepidine can improve attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms by modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission through the inhibition of GIRK channels. The purpose of this open-label trial was to confirm whether treatment with tipepidine can improve symptoms in pediatric patients with ADHD.Subjects and methods: This was a 4-week, open-label, proof-of-efficacy pilot study for pediatric subjects with ADHD. Ten pediatric ADHD subjects (70% male; mean age, 9.9 years; combined [inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive] subtype, n=7; inattentive subtype, n=3; hyperimpulsive subtype, n=0) received tipepidine hibenzate taken orally at 30 mg/day for 4 weeks. All subjects were assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS), Japanese version, and the Das–Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (DN-CAS), Japanese version.Results: A comparison of baseline scores and 4-week end-point scores showed that all the ADHD-RS scores (total scores, hyperimpulsive subscores, and inattentive subscores) improved significantly (P<0.001). Furthermore, a comparison of baseline DN-CAS total scores and 4-week end-point scores showed a mild trend of improvement (P=0.093). Tipepidine was well tolerated, with no patients discontinuing medication because of side effects.Conclusion: Our pilot study suggests that tipepidine therapy may prove to be an effective alternative treatment for pediatric patients with ADHD. Nonetheless, more detailed randomized, double-blind trials are needed to confirm tipepidine’s efficacy.Keywords: attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, tipepidine, GIRK channel, pediatric, antitussive, nucleus accumbensIntroductionAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common chronic psychiatric disorder, characterized by a pattern of developmentally inappropriate inattention, motor restlessness, and impulsivity, which affects between 3% and 7% of school-age children.1 Prospective follow-up studies found that approximately 50% of children with ADHD show symptoms that continue into adulthood, and when left untreated are associated with substance abuse, depression, unemployment, and criminal offenses.2,3Clinical guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of ADHD recommend psychostimulants (eg, methylphenidate, dexamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, lisdexamphetamine) and selective norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors, such as atomoxetine.4 Psychostimulants are known to increase synaptic dopamine concentrations through inhibition of the dopamine transporter, a mechanism that facilitates dopamine reuptake into presynaptic neurons.5 Selective norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors increase extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex.6 This accumulating evidence suggests that behavioral problems associated with ADHD may be related to cognitive dysfunction and early disturbances in dopaminergic innervation of basal ganglia and the frontal lobe.7 Genetic and molecular studies of ADHD also demonstrate an association between this disease and dopamine-related genes.7–12 However, psychostimulants induce a variety of side effects, including anorexia, headaches, stomach aches, insomnia, pyrexia, and tics.13 Moreover, the frequency of suicidal ideation was greater among atomoxetine-treated patients compared with placebo groups.14 These results highlight the need to identify new therapies for ADHD, particularly treatment with fewer side effects than currently available drugs.Tipepidine (3-[di-2-thienylmethylene]-1-methylpiperidine) has been used as a nonnarcotic antitussive in Japan since 1959. The safety of tipepidine in children and adults has already been established. Furthermore, suicide-related side effects have not been documented for tipepidine. It is reported that tipepidine inhibits G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK)-channel currents.15 The activation of the GIRK channels causes membrane hyperpolarization through potassium efflux. The inhibition of GIRK channels by tipepidine is expected to modulate the level of monoamines in the brain, since GIRK channels are coupled with G-protein-coupled receptors, including 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A, adrenaline α2 and dopamine D2 receptors.15 Using in vivo microdialysis, Kawaura et al demonstrated that tipepidine increases the levels of 5-HT and catecholamines, including dopamine, in the prefrontal cortex of rats.16 Furthermore, Fujieda et al17 showed that tipepidine could attenuate the hyperactivity induced in methamphetamine-treated mice (an ADHD model) by modulating these monoamine systems. Given these results, we put forward the hypothesis that tipepidine can improve ADHD symptoms by modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission through the inhibition of GIRK channels coupled with monoamine receptors in the brain. The purpose of this open trial was to confirm whether treatment with tipepidine could improve symptoms in pediatric patients with ADHD.Subjects and methodsEthics statementThe ethics committee of Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine approved the study protocol (G24061), and all subjects provided written informed consent for participation in the study. We registered this trial on the official database of clinical research (ClinicalTrials.gov) on April 16, 2013 (NCT01835093).18Study design and subjectsThis was a 4-week, open-label, proof-of-efficacy pilot study for pediatric subjects with ADHD. The baseline demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of ADHD are shown in Table 1. All subjects received tipepidine hibenzate tablets. Tipepidine was taken orally at 30 mg/day (10 mg after breakfast, 10 mg after supper, and 10 mg before bedtime), for 4 weeks. Ten pediatric subjects with ADHD were recruited from Chiba University Hospital outpatients. All subjects were diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria for ADHD,19 and were classified into three subtypes: combined (inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive), n=7; inattentive, n=3; and hyperimpulsive, n=0. Seven boys and three girls participated in this study. Seven subjects had received some drugs before entering the trial, namely methylphenidate (18–54 mg/day, n=2), atomoxetine (75 mg/day, n=1), aripiprazole (15 mg/day, n=1), a combination of methylphenidate and atomoxetine (18 and 60 mg/day, respectively, n=1), a combination of atomoxetine and aripiprazole (35 and 9 mg/day, respectively, n=1), and a combination of methylphenidate and risperidone (18 and 6 mg/day, respectively, n=1), while three subjects were drug-naïve. Treatment with these drugs was stable for the 4 weeks prior to enrollment, and was stable during the trial. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID)20 was conducted to exclude any current, past, personal, or familial history of mental illness. Two subjects were also diagnosed as having a learning disorder: one subject was diagnosed with tic disorders, and one with learning and tic disorders, according to the DSM-IV criteria.19Table 1 Baseline demographics and clinical and treatment characteristics of ADHD subjectsNote: Reported values are means ± standard deviation (n=10) or percentages.Abbreviations: ADHD, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder; WISC-III/IV, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III/IV; SD, standard deviation; IQ, intelligence quotient.Measurement of clinical symptomsAll patients were assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS), Japanese version.21 The ADHD-RS is a reliable and easy-to-administer instrument both for diagnosing ADHD in children and adolescents and for assessing treatment response. It consists of 18 items, with the scale being linked directly to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD.22 The Das–Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (DN-CAS), Japanese version,23 was used to assess cognitive function. The DN-CAS is an assessment battery designed to evaluate cognitive processing. It was developed to integrate theoretical and applied psychological knowledge, using cognitive processing theory and tests, designed to measure planning, attention, and simultaneous and successive processing (PASS) in individuals aged 5–17 years. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children third/fourth editions (WISC-III/IV),24,25 Japanese versions, were used to assess the full intelligent quotient of all patients.Statistical ysisStatistical yses were performed using the software package SPSS version 21.0 for Macintosh (IBM Armonk, NY, USA). The data show means ± standard deviation. Student’s paired t-test was used to compare changes from baseline to 4 weeks. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used as a post hoc test to compare changes from baseline to 4 weeks. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsThe baseline scores and mean changes of primary and secondary outcomes from the 4-week trial of tipepidine in ADHD subjects are shown in Table 2. A comparison of baseline scores and 4-week end-point scores showed that all the ADHD-RS scores (total scores, hyperimpulsive subscores, and inattentive subscores) improved significantly (P<0.001). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test also detected statistical significance in all ADHD-RS scores (P<0.005). However, a comparison of baseline scores and 4-week end-point scores found that none of the DN-CAS scores (total scores and planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive subscores) showed significant change. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test also failed to detect statistical significance in any DN-CAS score changes.Table 2 Baseline scores and mean changes of primary and secondary outcomes after a 4-week trial of tipepidine in ADHD subjectsNotes: *P<0.05. Student’s paired t-test was used to compare changes from baseline to 4 weeks. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used as a post hoc test to compare changes from baseline to 4 weeks.Abbreviations: ADHD, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; ADHD-RS, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale IV (Japanese version); DN-CAS, Das–Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (Japanese version).Tipepidine was well tolerated, with no patients discontinuing medication because of side effects. No significant effects were revealed in blood parameters, urine ysis, weight, height, blood pressure, or cardiac frequency during the 4-week follow-up period.DiscussionTipepidine improved the ADHD symptoms of inattention and hyperimpulsivity, as shown by ADHD-RS scores. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the beneficial effect of tipepidine in treating pediatric ADHD subjects.Comparisons of all baseline DN-CAS scores (total scores and planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive subscores) and 4-week end-point scores detected no significant differences. However, a comparison of baseline DN-CAS total scores and 4-week end-point scores did show a mild trend of improvement (P=0.093).The lower improvement in DN-CAS symptomatology may have been partly due to the relatively low dosage of tipepidine used in this study (1.288±0.349 mg/kg/day, Table 1), compared with that of the Fujieda et al trial in mice (20 mg/kg).17 Higher dosages may be more beneficial for ADHD symptoms, as they are associated with higher monoaminergic neurotransmission through GIRK channels. At present, the optimal dosage of tipepidine for ADHD is unknown, and defining this dosage should be the primary focus in the treatment of these patients.The inhibition of GIRK channels by tipepidine is predicted to modulate brain monoamine levels in a similar manner to psychostimulants and selective norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors. However, this trial found none of the side effects typically associated with psychostimulants and selective norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors. Tipepidine has been used safely as an over-the-counter antitussive for children and adults in Japan since 1959. Therefore, safety issues will be no of no concern if this is used as a new treatment for ADHD.Very recently, Hamasaki et al showed that tipepidine activated dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area through the inhibition of GIRK channel-activated currents, and their preliminary microdialysis study showed that tipepidine dramatically increased dopamine levels in the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc).26 In addition, Costa Dias et al identified the possible involvement of NAc connections in the pathophysiology of impulsive decision making in ADHD, using functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging.27 Therefore, further detailed studies of tipepidine use in ADHD are needed to investigate dopamine activation in the NAc and its neural pathways.The main limitation of this study was the small sample size (n=10). The second limitation was the low proportion of drug-naïve subjects. Further studies with greater ytical power, larger sample sizes, and more drug-naïve subjects will be necessary.ConclusionIn conclusion, our pilot study suggests that tipepidine therapy may prove to be an effective alternative treatment for pediatric patients with ADHD, and since this drug is already in wide clinical use for other conditions, there should be no ensuing safety issues. However, the safety of long-term tipepidine use needs to be evaluated carefully, since many antitussive medications are completed within 1 week. Nonetheless, more detailed randomized, double-blind studies are needed to confirm tipepidine’s efficacy and safety.Author contributionsT Sasaki and K Hashimoto drafted the mcript. K Hashimoto is the principal investigator of this study. All authors recruited the patients, revised the article, conducted the statistical ysis, approved the final mcript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.AcknowledgmentsThe authors are very grateful to Aya Tano and Nao Miyazaki (Chiba University), for their valuable advice on the use of DN-CAS. The authors thank Kaoru Ikeda, Chisako Fujishiro, Kimika Akiba, Natsuko Tateshouji, Komako Ito (Chiba University), the staff of the Department of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital, and Chiba University Hospital Clinical Research Center for their assistance with this trial.DisclosureThe authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.References1.Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, Biederman J, Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression ysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:942–948.2.Biederman J, Mick E, Surman C, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59:829–835.3.Molina BS, Hinshaw SP, Swanson JM, et al. The MTA at 8 years: prospective follow-up of children treated for combined-type ADHD in a multisite study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48:484–500.4.Seixas M, Weiss M, Müller U. Systematic review of national and international guidelines on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26:753–765.5.Solanto MV. Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res. 1998;94:127–152.6.Bymaster FP, Katner JS, Nelson DL, et al. Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;27:699–711.7.Gill M, Daly G, Heron S, Hawi Z, Fitzgerald M. Confirmation of association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and a dopamine transporter polymorphism. Mol Psychiatry. 1997;2:311–313.8.Cook EH Jr, Stein MA, Krasowski MD, et al. Association of attention-deficit disorder and the dopamine transporter gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;56:993–998.9.LaHoste GJ, Swanson JM, Wigal SB, et al. Dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 1996;1:121–124.10.Faraone SV, Perlis RH, Doyle AE, et al. Molecular genetics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1313–1323.11.Bobb AJ, Castellanos FX, Addington AM, Rapoport JL. Molecular genetic studies of ADHD: 1991 to 2004. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2005;132:109–125.12.Li D, Sham PC, Owen MJ, He L. Meta-ysis shows significant association between dopamine system genes and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2276–2284.13.Huang YS, Tsai MH. Long-term outcomes with medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: current status of knowledge. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:539–554.14.Bangs ME, Tauscher-Wisniewski S, Polzer J, et al. Meta-ysis of suicide-related behavior events in patients treated with atomoxetine. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:209–218.15.Takahama K, Shirasaki T, Soeda F. Central mechanisms III: neuronal mechanisms of action of centrally acting antitussives using electrophysiological and neurochemical study approaches. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009:219–240.16.Kawaura K, Honda S, Soeda F, Shirasaki T, Takahama K. [A novel antidepressant-like action of drugs possessing GIRK channel blocking action in rats]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2010;130:699–705. Japanese.17.Fujieda Y, Soeda F, Shirasaki T, Takahama K. Centrally-acting antitussives depress drug-induced hyperactivity in mice. J Pharm Sci. 2006;100 Suppl 2:238.18.Chiba University. An Open Study of Tipepidine Hibenzate in Patients With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01835093. NLM identifier:NCT01835093. Accessed January 10, 2014.19.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.20.Sheehan DV, Sheehan KH, Shytle RD, et al. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71;313–326.21.DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, Reid R. ADHD Rating Scale–IV (for Children and Adolescents): Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation. New York: Guilford; 1998.22.Tani I, Okada R, Ohnishi M, Nakajima S, Tsujii M. Japanese version of home form of the ADHD-RS: an evaluation of its reliability and validity. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31:1426–1433.23.Das JP, Naglieri JA, Kirby JR. Assessment of Cognitive Process: The PASS Theory of Intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1994.24.Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 3rd ed. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1991.25.Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 4th ed. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1998.26.Hamasaki R, Shirasaki T, Soeda F, Takahama K. Tipepidine activates VTA dopamine neuron via inhibiting dopamine D2 receptor-mediated inward rectifying K(+) current. Neuroscience. 2013;252:24–34.27.Costa Dias TG, Wilson VB, Bathula DR, et al. Reward circuit connectivity relates to delay discounting in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23:33–45. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.  Sasaki T, Hashimoto K, Tachibana M, Kurata T, Kimura H, Komatsu H, Ishikawa M, Hasegawa T, Shiina A, Hashimoto T, Kanahara N, Shiraishi T, Iyo M Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014, 10:719-722 Published Date: 5 May 2014Jeong HR, An SSA Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1873-1879 Published Date: 19 November 2015Cai Y, An SSA, Kim SY Clinical Interventions in Aging 2015, 10:1163-1172 Published Date: 14 July 2015Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889 Published Date: 16 April 2014Cui Y, Song Y, Wang J, Yu Z, Schuster A, Barrett YC, Frost C Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014, 6:61-62 Published Date: 27 March 2014Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779 Published Date: 15 November 2012Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724 Published Date: 12 November 2012Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088 Published Date: 27 July 2012Rao S, Song Y, Peddie F, Evans AM International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:1245-1251 Published Date: 20 June 2011Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711 Published Date: 14 July 2010Jim Moselhy, Tasnim Vira, Fei-Fei Liu, et al International Journal of Nanomedicine 2009, 4:153-164 Published Date: 24 August 2009 Contact Us   •  Privacy Policy   •  Associations & Partners   •  Testimonials   •  Sitemap   •  Terms & Conditions   •  Recommend this site •  Top Contact Us  •  Privacy Policy © Copyright 2017  •  Dove Press Ltd   •  Website development by maffey.com •  Web Design by Adhesion The opinions expressed in all articles published here are those of the specific author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dove Medical Press Ltd or any of its employees.



The Child and Adolescent Service System Program (CASSP) model launched by the National Institute of Mental Health stated that youth with emotional disturbances should be treated in the least restrictive setting (Stroul and Friedman, 1986). However, clinicians often encounter children and adolescents with severe psychiatric illnesses who require 24-hour supervised treatment. At the same time that long-term state hospital beds have been significantly reduced, managed care has led to a sharp reduction in the length of stay of acute admissions (Pottick et al., 2000). As a result, pediatric patients who fail to respond to repeated brief hospitalizations and intensive outpatient programs are referred to residential treatment facilities (RTFs) (Wells, 1991). Patients in RTFs have severe and chronic disorders, have received a variety of treatments in the past and are often taking several psychotropic medications (Connor et al., 1998). googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display("dfp-ad-sky_1_160_600"); }); Addressing Polypharmacy During brief hospital stays, medications are often used to quickly stabilize patients. During repeated admissions, medications often accumulate. New medications are added, while past medications may be continued for no apparent reason. For example, Connor et al. (1997) found polypharmacy in 60.3% of patients admitted to an RTF. One factor associated with polypharmacy was the number of previous psychiatric placements. Despite the CASSP principles, many youth continue to be in need of residential treatment due to insufficient quality and quantity of outpatient services; overwhelming psychosocial adversity; and significant illness severity. Advantages of RTFs are the ability to treat the patient in a safe and structured environment with a multidisciplinary team (milieu therapy, individual and group psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, family therapy, special education) over a longer period of time. In this context, a minimum of pharmacotherapy need be instituted. Ideally, treatment in RTFs should lead to a reduction in medications. This hypothesis was evaluated through a retrospective chart review of 24 male patients (mean age=12.8 plus/minus 2.5 with a range from 9 years to 17 years) consecutively treated in an RTF over an 18-month period. Seventy-five percent of patients were white, 17% were African-American, and 8% were Hispanic. Patients with mental retardation or significant substance use were not admitted. On admission, all patients were interviewed with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children and adolescents (MINI-KID) (Sheehan et al., 1998). Collateral information was obtained from parents, past records and social agencies. Physical examinations were routinely performed. Diagnoses were made according to DSM-IV along the five axes; these can be found in Table 1. The mean Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score on admission was 34.4±4.5. On entry into the RTF, patients were taking an average of 2.6±1.4 medications (range=0 to 5). The numbers of medication taken can be found in the Figure and the types in Table 2. The number of prior medication trials, not including the admission medications, was 2.1±1.6. The mean number of hospitalizations before the RTF placement was 3.1±2.4, with a range from 0 to 10. Statistically significant correlations existed between the number of prior hospitalizations and both the number of pre-RTF medication trials (R=0.64; p=0.0008; df 22) and the number of medications on admission (R=0.47; p=0.02; df 22). Throughout the RTF stay (mean length of stay=279.3 days±163.1 days), progress was measured with the Child Behavior Rating Form-Abbreviated (CBRF) (Van Egeren et al., 1999), filled out twice per day by staff. Diagnosis-specific rating scales, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder scales in the classroom, were used as well. School and parent reports were reviewed twice per week. Mental status examinations were performed on a weekly basis by a board certified child and adolescent psychiatrist. Based on this information, GAF scale scores on Axis V were adjusted. During the treatment, 17 patients (71%) had the number of their medications reduced. Five patients remained on the same number and two patients were treated with an increased number of medications. Overall, the total number of medications prescribed decreased from 63 on admission to 38 on discharge, a 40% decrease. Alpha-2 agonists, antipsychotics and antidepressants were stopped most frequently. Patients were taking an average of 1.6±1.3 medications at discharge (range=0 to 4) (Figure). At the same time, the mean GAF score showed a 27% increase from 34.4±4.5 to 43.8±8.9. About UsArchivesCurrent Issue/PDFPrint SubscriptionEnews/Online AccessClinical ScalesMedia Kit/AdvertisingGuide to AuthorsEditorial BoardReader Advisory BoardContact Us By clicking Accept, you agree to become a member of the UBM Medica Community.





#Contact US #Terms of Use #Privacy Policy #Earnings Disclaimer